School LeadersContact

Bond & Facilities

Facility Master Planning

A facility master plan that sits on a shelf is worse than no plan at all — it gives boards false confidence and gets weaponized in the next bond debate. School Leaders builds master plans that work as decision-making instruments: tied to LCAP, demographics, and the real funding cycles California districts operate in — and delivered with a live, community-facing webapp so the plan stays usable long after adoption.

Our approach

How we work

Our master planning starts with the district's strategic plan (LCAP, instructional priorities), overlays demographics and enrollment forecasts, and tests the asset inventory against actual instructional delivery needs. The output isn't a 200-page bound document that gets filed away — it's a prioritized capital plan a board can vote on, a finance team can budget against, and a community can actually engage with through an interactive webapp built alongside the published document. Every engagement now ships with a live, public-facing Master Plan Explorer (Yosemite USD was the first; the model is portable to any California district) — filterable by site, priority, and category, with live cost rollups, state-match math, and a phasing chart. Built and hosted by our team. Updated when the plan refreshes.

What you get

Deliverables

  • District-wide condition and capacity assessment
  • 10-year demographic and enrollment forecast
  • Educational adequacy analysis aligned to LCAP and instructional plan
  • Prioritized project list with cost estimates and funding source mapping
  • OPSC / Prop 2 funding eligibility analysis per project
  • Five-year preventive maintenance plan with CMMS recommendations
  • Board presentation deck and community engagement materials
  • Live, public-facing community webapp — interactive Master Plan Explorer built by School Leaders
  • Updateable financial model — refresh annually as conditions change

Outcomes

Master plans that survive board turnover, drive the next 2–3 bond measures, and stay legible to the community through a live webapp the district owns.

New · Unified facility-planning platform · Free

Master Plan Studio

The one-source online platform for California school facility planning. Four steps in one workflow: Vision (district profile) → Compose (kit-of-parts builder) → 3D Render (real WebGL massing) → AI Analyze (streamed master-plan brief grounded in CA statute and 2025 SFP rates). Free, no login.

Open Master Plan Studio

Powered by School Leaders · Three.js / WebGL · California-grounded

What it ties together

  • Campus Concept Studio inputs
  • Modular Campus Designer kit
  • Real WebGL 3D render
  • Combined AI master-plan brief

Cutting-edge deliverable

Every plan ships with a live community webapp

Most California master plans end as a 170-page PDF on a shelf. Ours don't. Alongside the Prop 2- and OPSC-ready document, we build, host, and maintain an interactive Master Plan Explorer — a real, public-facing webapp the board, the cabinet, and the community can use any day of the year. Below is a working demo built from the Yosemite Unified School District 2025 plan. Try filtering by site, priority, and category — the cost rollups and state-match math update in real time.

yusd.facilitiesplan.org Live

Yosemite Unified School District

Facility Master Plan — Community Explorer

Filter by site, priority, and category to see the projects shaping our schools through 2031.

Mobile-ready · Translated · Public
Schools in plan
3 main + 2

YHS · CES · RES

2024-25 enrollment
1,387

Stable base

Plan horizon
2025–2031

6-year capital

Total preliminary cost
$74.8M

Pre-escalation

Site
Priority

Projects shown

36

of 36 in the plan

Estimated cost

$48.9M

$48,881,000

Prop 2 / SFP state match (est.)

$9.3M

Local match ≈ $39.6M

  • Security fencing & single-point-of-entry gates at campus frontage

    Yosemite HS·Safety/ADAP1

    $300K

    Est.

  • Safety & security surveillance camera system (30+ cameras)

    Yosemite HS·Safety/ADAP1

    $225K

    Est.

  • ADA-compliant parking at 900 building

    Yosemite HS·Safety/ADAP1

    $180K

    Est.

  • Upgraded building & ADA signage with wayfinding kiosks

    Yosemite HS·Safety/ADAP1

    $120K

    Est.

  • Roof replacement — gymnasium, kitchen & 1500 building

    Yosemite HS·RoofingP1

    $960K

    Est.

  • Roof replacement — wrestling, locker rooms & pool complex

    Yosemite HS·RoofingP1

    $675K

    Est.

  • Metal decking panel replacement — Ansel Adams 1500 classroom building

    Yosemite HS·RoofingP2

    $2.5M

    Est.

  • Sloped metal roof panel replacement — 900/200/100/300/500/400/700/800 buildings

    Yosemite HS·RoofingP2

    $1.9M

    Est.

  • 26 split-system HVAC units — 1500 building (104 tons)

    Yosemite HS·HVACP2

    $1.0M

    Est.

  • 19 HVAC package units — 900/300/100/200/400/700/ed. opts. (96 tons)

    Yosemite HS·HVACP2

    $960K

    Est.

  • Window glazing replacement — Title 24 compliance, 6 original buildings + 1500

    Yosemite HS·Classroom ModP2

    $600K

    Est.

  • Carpet replacement — 1500/music/200/300/700 buildings (40,000 sf)

    Yosemite HS·Classroom ModP2

    $1.0M

    Est.

  • Culinary Arts classroom industry-standards upgrade

    Yosemite HS·Classroom ModP2

    $400K

    Est.

  • Badger Stadium repairs & ADA upgrades (aisles, restrooms, scoreboard)

    Yosemite HS·AthleticsP1

    $1.5M

    Est.

  • Badger Stadium field-turf installation & track resurfacing

    Yosemite HS·AthleticsP2

    $1.5M

    Est.

  • Pool deck & pool-wall reconstruction (500,000-gal complex)

    Yosemite HS·AthleticsP2

    $7.0M

    Est.

  • New District Educational Options Support Center (10,000 sf)

    Yosemite HS·New ConstructionP3

    $5.0M

    Est.

  • New Agricultural Science & Mechanics classroom center

    Yosemite HS·New ConstructionP3

    $1.3M

    Est.

  • Industrial Technology classroom project-development spaces

    Yosemite HS·New ConstructionP2

    $975K

    Est.

  • Five new classrooms to replace 35-year-old obsolete portables (50,000 sf)

    Yosemite HS·New ConstructionP3

    $2.5M

    Est.

  • Water filtration system — magnesium, iron, arsenic remediation (DSA in progress)

    Coarsegold Elem (K-8)·Safety/ADAP1

    $600K

    Est.

  • Single-point-of-entry control upgrades & perimeter fencing

    Coarsegold Elem (K-8)·Safety/ADAP1

    $450K

    Est.

  • Roof replacement — 200/400 classrooms, cafeteria/multipurpose, restroom building

    Coarsegold Elem (K-8)·RoofingP1

    $1.4M

    Est.

  • 18 HVAC package units & 14 Bard heat-pump portable units replacement

    Coarsegold Elem (K-8)·HVACP2

    $1.4M

    Est.

  • New library building + outdoor learning shade structure (replaces obsolete amphitheatre risers)

    Coarsegold Elem (K-8)·New ConstructionP2

    $1.8M

    Est.

  • New band & music building (instrument storage, practice, performance)

    Coarsegold Elem (K-8)·New ConstructionP3

    $1.4M

    Est.

  • Classroom modernization — 13 site-built + 9 portable, ADA sink access

    Coarsegold Elem (K-8)·Classroom ModP2

    $950K

    Est.

  • Campus perimeter fencing & gate controls — single point of entry

    Rivergold Elem (K-8)·Safety/ADAP1

    $380K

    Est.

  • Roof replacement — primary classroom buildings (Phase 1)

    Rivergold Elem (K-8)·RoofingP1

    $1.6M

    Est.

  • HVAC package-unit replacement — 22 units across portable & site-built classrooms

    Rivergold Elem (K-8)·HVACP2

    $1.6M

    Est.

  • Classroom modernization — flooring, casework, window glazing per Title 24

    Rivergold Elem (K-8)·Classroom ModP2

    $1.8M

    Est.

  • Playfield drainage & turf renovations (TK–8 outdoor learning)

    Rivergold Elem (K-8)·SiteworkP2

    $320K

    Est.

  • New multipurpose / cafeteria expansion (utilization capacity boost)

    Rivergold Elem (K-8)·New ConstructionP3

    $4.2M

    Est.

  • Outdoor learning environments + shade structures (4 sites)

    Rivergold Elem (K-8)·SiteworkP2

    $280K

    Est.

  • ADA ramps, kitchen modernization, accessibility upgrades

    Raymond-Granite HS·Safety/ADAP1

    $83K

    Est.

  • Accessible restroom building + parking & pathway repairs

    YUSD Adult School·Safety/ADAP1

    $133K

    Est.

Phasing of filtered projects

P1 · 0–2 yrs
$8.7M
P2 · 3–5 yrs
$25.9M
P3 · 6+ yrs
$14.3M

This is an interactive demo of the live community-facing webapp School Leaders built for YUSD — part of the deliverable, alongside the published Facility Master Plan. Project list and cost estimates drawn from the 2025 YUSD Facility Master Plan Needs Assessment (Section VIII).

Read the full Yosemite USD case study

Yosemite USD was the first district to receive the live webapp deliverable. The model is portable to any California district.

New · Generative AI · Free

Campus Concept Studio — an AI-native planning conversation starter

Even before the formal Master Plan engagement begins, boards and superintendents need a way to test concepts in front of their community. So we built one. Pick eight inputs — school level, enrollment, site context, climate zone, programmatic priorities, design language, sustainability target, bond budget — and the platform streams back a full conceptual campus plan in about fifteen seconds. Vision narrative, programmatic space matrix per CDE loading standards, May 2026 California construction-cost range, phasing recommendation, Prop 2 / OPSC funding map with per-pupil entitlements computed, and a risk-callout list covering DSA, CEQA, Field Act, prevailing wage, and Title 24 climate-zone-specific considerations. Free. No login. Try it below.

schoolleaders.com/tools/campus-concept-studio Live · Generative AI

AI-native facility planning

Campus Concept Studio

Pick eight planning inputs. Get an AI-generated campus concept — vision, programmatic space matrix, cost range, Prop 2 / OPSC funding map, and risk callouts — in about 15 seconds. For board and community conversation, not architectural design.

Z12

1 = North Coast · 12 = Central Valley · 14 = Desert · 16 = Sierra

Selected: 3

Ready when you are

~15 seconds to stream a full concept · 3 priorities selected

Concept site plan · AI parametric

NSTEMAthleticsOutdoor learningAdminSTEMMPRCTE

Schematic massing diagram only — not architectural design.

For planning conversation only. This tool generates conceptual planning material with AI. It is not architectural design. All California K-12 construction requires a licensed Architect of Record under the California Architects Practice Act, DSA approval under the Field Act (Ed Code §17280+), CEQA review, and compliance with Title 24, AB 2226, and prevailing wage law. Outputs must be validated by licensed professionals before any design, scope, or funding decisions.

Open the full Campus Concept Studio

Conceptual planning aid. Not architectural design. All California K-12 construction requires a licensed Architect of Record, DSA approval, and validation by district facilities professionals.

New · Kit-of-parts modular designer · Free

Modular Campus Designer — compose a school from a kit of parts

When modular makes sense — replacing obsolete portables, post-disaster rebuild, capacity expansion on a tight bond budget, modernization phasing — districts need a way to test compositions before procuring. So we built one. Click building modules from the palette to compose a campus; the site canvas auto-arranges your composition; live rollups show gross SF, classroom capacity, modular cost band, and the savings versus equivalent site-built delivery (typically 25–40%). When you're ready, stream a full AI analysis covering DSA Pre-Checked Plans pathway, program viability, configuration gaps, sustainability strategy for prefab, and sequencing. Free. No login.

schoolleaders.com/tools/modular-campus-designer Live · Kit-of-parts

Kit-of-parts modular designer

Modular Campus Designer

Compose a school campus from modular building modules. Live cost, capacity, and SF rollups; modular-vs-site-built savings; streamed AI analysis covering DSA Pre-Checked-Plans pathway, program viability, and sequencing.

Module palette · click to add

Instructional

Common spaces

Support

Outdoor

Site composition · auto-arranged

Empty site — add modules to begin

Empty siteClick modules in the palette to compose your campus

Modules

0

Empty layout

Gross SF

0

Sum of module SF

Classroom capacity

0

Students

Modular cost

$0–$0

Add modules to see savings

AI analysis

~15 seconds · DSA pathway · cost compare · gaps · sequencing

Planning aid only. This is an AI-generated kit-of-parts planning tool, not architectural design. California modular K-12 construction still requires DSA review under the Field Act (Ed Code §17280+), CEQA, Title 24 compliance, prevailing wage (Labor Code §1771), and a licensed Architect of Record under the California Architects Practice Act. DSA Pre-Checked (PC) Plans pathways exist but still require Inspector of Record and site-specific approvals.

Open the full Modular Campus Designer

Conceptual planning aid. DSA review, CEQA, Title 24, prevailing wage, and a licensed Architect of Record still apply to any real California modular K-12 project.

Frequently asked

Questions districts ask us

Do you build the live community webapp for every master plan engagement?

Yes — every facility master plan we deliver now ships with a live, public-facing webapp alongside the published document. Yosemite USD was the first; the model is portable to any California district. The webapp lets board members, parents, teachers, and community stakeholders filter the project portfolio by site, priority, and category, with live cost rollups and state-match (Prop 2 / SFP) math. It runs on any device, with no login. When the master plan refreshes — at the recommended three-year mid-cycle review or before the next bond measure — the webapp updates with it. View the live demo on our Yosemite USD case study.

Why does a facility master plan need a webapp on top of the PDF?

A 170-page PDF is necessary but not sufficient. Boards adopt it, cabinets reference it, but community members rarely read it cover-to-cover — and the engagement gap between the published plan and the people who live in the schools every day is where most master plans quietly lose legitimacy. A live webapp solves three structural problems PDFs cannot: community access (a parent will spend ten minutes filtering an interactive app, never download a 170-page PDF), board operational use (the fastest way to see what Priority 1 projects haven't been funded is filtering by priority in real time during a meeting), and bond campaign readiness (when the District goes to voters, the webapp becomes the spine of community engagement, with every dollar mapped to a real project at a real school).

How often should a California school district update its facility master plan?

Every 3–5 years for the full plan, with annual refresh on the financial model and priority list. The Office of Public School Construction expects current master planning evidence for many funding applications, and demographics shift fast enough that a 7-year-old plan is often dangerously stale. Under Proposition 2 (Nov 2024) and AB 247, every district participating in the School Facility Program must file a board-approved five-year School Facilities Master Plan.

What's the role of the school board in facility master planning?

The board sets the success criteria upfront (LCAP priorities, equity goals, fiscal posture), reviews scenarios as they emerge, and ultimately adopts the prioritized project list as policy. Boards that aren't engaged early end up rejecting recommendations late, which kills momentum. Most successful master plans run a board workshop at the start, mid-project, and adoption.

How long does a master plan take to develop?

4–6 months for a typical mid-sized district. The pacing constraints are usually demographic data collection (CALPADS pulls, vendor forecasts) and community engagement cycles, not the analysis itself. The Yosemite USD engagement closed in six months across three main schools, two satellite facilities, $74.8M in identified capital needs, and a fully built interactive webapp.

Can we use Prop 2 funding for master planning?

Some master planning activities qualify for OPSC funding under specific programs, but most planning costs are funded from the district's general fund or carved out of a bond program's soft-cost budget. We help districts structure planning costs to maximize reimbursement where possible.

From our team

Watch

40 Years Transforming Schools: Joe Dixon on Building Communities Through Better Facilities

Meet Joe Dixon, founder of School Leaders and a 40-year veteran of transforming educational environments. From starting at the bottom of Capistrano Unified in 1984 to leading Prop 51's passage for California school funding, Joe's journey proves that great schools create great communities — sometimes one lunch table at a time.

Ready to talk about facility master planning?

30 minutes with one of our advisors. We'll listen first, share where we've seen this play out, and tell you honestly whether we can help.