A facility master plan that sits on a shelf is worse than no plan at all — it gives boards false confidence and gets weaponized in the next bond debate. School Leaders builds master plans that work as decision-making instruments: tied to LCAP, demographics, and the real funding cycles California districts operate in — and delivered with a live, community-facing webapp so the plan stays usable long after adoption.
Our master planning starts with the district's strategic plan (LCAP, instructional priorities), overlays demographics and enrollment forecasts, and tests the asset inventory against actual instructional delivery needs. The output isn't a 200-page bound document that gets filed away — it's a prioritized capital plan a board can vote on, a finance team can budget against, and a community can actually engage with through an interactive webapp built alongside the published document. Every engagement now ships with a live, public-facing Master Plan Explorer (Yosemite USD was the first; the model is portable to any California district) — filterable by site, priority, and category, with live cost rollups, state-match math, and a phasing chart. Built and hosted by our team. Updated when the plan refreshes.
What you get
Deliverables
District-wide condition and capacity assessment
10-year demographic and enrollment forecast
Educational adequacy analysis aligned to LCAP and instructional plan
Prioritized project list with cost estimates and funding source mapping
OPSC / Prop 2 funding eligibility analysis per project
Five-year preventive maintenance plan with CMMS recommendations
Board presentation deck and community engagement materials
Live, public-facing community webapp — interactive Master Plan Explorer built by School Leaders
Updateable financial model — refresh annually as conditions change
Outcomes
Master plans that survive board turnover, drive the next 2–3 bond measures, and stay legible to the community through a live webapp the district owns.
New · Unified facility-planning platform · Free
Master Plan Studio
The one-source online platform for California school facility planning. Four steps in one workflow: Vision (district profile) → Compose (kit-of-parts builder) → 3D Render (real WebGL massing) → AI Analyze (streamed master-plan brief grounded in CA statute and 2025 SFP rates). Free, no login.
Powered by School Leaders · Three.js / WebGL · California-grounded
What it ties together
Campus Concept Studio inputs
Modular Campus Designer kit
Real WebGL 3D render
Combined AI master-plan brief
Cutting-edge deliverable
Every plan ships with a live community webapp
Most California master plans end as a 170-page PDF on a shelf. Ours don't. Alongside the Prop 2- and OPSC-ready document, we build, host, and maintain an interactive Master Plan Explorer — a real, public-facing webapp the board, the cabinet, and the community can use any day of the year. Below is a working demo built from the Yosemite Unified School District 2025 plan. Try filtering by site, priority, and category — the cost rollups and state-match math update in real time.
yusd.facilitiesplan.org Live
Built by School Leaders
Yosemite Unified School District
Facility Master Plan — Community Explorer
Filter by site, priority, and category to see the projects shaping our schools through 2031.
Mobile-ready · Translated · Public
Schools in plan
3 main + 2
YHS · CES · RES
2024-25 enrollment
1,387
Stable base
Plan horizon
2025–2031
6-year capital
Total preliminary cost
$74.8M
Pre-escalation
Site
Priority
Projects shown
36
of 36 in the plan
Estimated cost
$48.9M
$48,881,000
Prop 2 / SFP state match (est.)
$9.3M
Local match ≈ $39.6M
Security fencing & single-point-of-entry gates at campus frontage
Yosemite HS·Safety/ADAP1
$300K
Est.
Safety & security surveillance camera system (30+ cameras)
Yosemite HS·Safety/ADAP1
$225K
Est.
ADA-compliant parking at 900 building
Yosemite HS·Safety/ADAP1
$180K
Est.
Upgraded building & ADA signage with wayfinding kiosks
Yosemite HS·Safety/ADAP1
$120K
Est.
Roof replacement — gymnasium, kitchen & 1500 building
Yosemite HS·RoofingP1
$960K
Est.
Roof replacement — wrestling, locker rooms & pool complex
Yosemite HS·RoofingP1
$675K
Est.
Metal decking panel replacement — Ansel Adams 1500 classroom building
Yosemite HS·RoofingP2
$2.5M
Est.
Sloped metal roof panel replacement — 900/200/100/300/500/400/700/800 buildings
Yosemite HS·RoofingP2
$1.9M
Est.
26 split-system HVAC units — 1500 building (104 tons)
Yosemite HS·HVACP2
$1.0M
Est.
19 HVAC package units — 900/300/100/200/400/700/ed. opts. (96 tons)
Yosemite HS·HVACP2
$960K
Est.
Window glazing replacement — Title 24 compliance, 6 original buildings + 1500
ADA ramps, kitchen modernization, accessibility upgrades
Raymond-Granite HS·Safety/ADAP1
$83K
Est.
Accessible restroom building + parking & pathway repairs
YUSD Adult School·Safety/ADAP1
$133K
Est.
Phasing of filtered projects
P1 · 0–2 yrs
$8.7M
P2 · 3–5 yrs
$25.9M
P3 · 6+ yrs
$14.3M
This is an interactive demo of the live community-facing webapp School Leaders built for YUSD — part of the deliverable, alongside the published Facility Master Plan. Project list and cost estimates drawn from the 2025 YUSD Facility Master Plan Needs Assessment (Section VIII).
Yosemite USD was the first district to receive the live webapp deliverable. The model is portable to any California district.
New · Generative AI · Free
Campus Concept Studio — an AI-native planning conversation starter
Even before the formal Master Plan engagement begins, boards and superintendents need a way to test concepts in front of their community. So we built one. Pick eight inputs — school level, enrollment, site context, climate zone, programmatic priorities, design language, sustainability target, bond budget — and the platform streams back a full conceptual campus plan in about fifteen seconds. Vision narrative, programmatic space matrix per CDE loading standards, May 2026 California construction-cost range, phasing recommendation, Prop 2 / OPSC funding map with per-pupil entitlements computed, and a risk-callout list covering DSA, CEQA, Field Act, prevailing wage, and Title 24 climate-zone-specific considerations. Free. No login. Try it below.
schoolleaders.com/tools/campus-concept-studio Live · Generative AI
Powered by School Leaders
AI-native facility planning
Campus Concept Studio
Pick eight planning inputs. Get an AI-generated campus concept — vision, programmatic space matrix, cost range, Prop 2 / OPSC funding map, and risk callouts — in about 15 seconds. For board and community conversation, not architectural design.
Streaming · CA-specific
Z12
1 = North Coast · 12 = Central Valley · 14 = Desert · 16 = Sierra
Selected: 3
Ready when you are
~15 seconds to stream a full concept · 3 priorities selected
Concept site plan · AI parametric
Schematic massing diagram only — not architectural design.
For planning conversation only. This tool generates conceptual planning material with AI. It is not architectural design. All California K-12 construction requires a licensed Architect of Record under the California Architects Practice Act, DSA approval under the Field Act (Ed Code §17280+), CEQA review, and compliance with Title 24, AB 2226, and prevailing wage law. Outputs must be validated by licensed professionals before any design, scope, or funding decisions.
Conceptual planning aid. Not architectural design. All California K-12 construction requires a licensed Architect of Record, DSA approval, and validation by district facilities professionals.
New · Kit-of-parts modular designer · Free
Modular Campus Designer — compose a school from a kit of parts
When modular makes sense — replacing obsolete portables, post-disaster rebuild, capacity expansion on a tight bond budget, modernization phasing — districts need a way to test compositions before procuring. So we built one. Click building modules from the palette to compose a campus; the site canvas auto-arranges your composition; live rollups show gross SF, classroom capacity, modular cost band, and the savings versus equivalent site-built delivery (typically 25–40%). When you're ready, stream a full AI analysis covering DSA Pre-Checked Plans pathway, program viability, configuration gaps, sustainability strategy for prefab, and sequencing. Free. No login.
schoolleaders.com/tools/modular-campus-designer Live · Kit-of-parts
Powered by School Leaders
Kit-of-parts modular designer
Modular Campus Designer
Compose a school campus from modular building modules. Live cost, capacity, and SF rollups; modular-vs-site-built savings; streamed AI analysis covering DSA Pre-Checked-Plans pathway, program viability, and sequencing.
Planning aid only. This is an AI-generated kit-of-parts planning tool, not architectural design. California modular K-12 construction still requires DSA review under the Field Act (Ed Code §17280+), CEQA, Title 24 compliance, prevailing wage (Labor Code §1771), and a licensed Architect of Record under the California Architects Practice Act. DSA Pre-Checked (PC) Plans pathways exist but still require Inspector of Record and site-specific approvals.
Conceptual planning aid. DSA review, CEQA, Title 24, prevailing wage, and a licensed Architect of Record still apply to any real California modular K-12 project.
Frequently asked
Questions districts ask us
Do you build the live community webapp for every master plan engagement?
Yes — every facility master plan we deliver now ships with a live, public-facing webapp alongside the published document. Yosemite USD was the first; the model is portable to any California district. The webapp lets board members, parents, teachers, and community stakeholders filter the project portfolio by site, priority, and category, with live cost rollups and state-match (Prop 2 / SFP) math. It runs on any device, with no login. When the master plan refreshes — at the recommended three-year mid-cycle review or before the next bond measure — the webapp updates with it. View the live demo on our Yosemite USD case study.
Why does a facility master plan need a webapp on top of the PDF?
A 170-page PDF is necessary but not sufficient. Boards adopt it, cabinets reference it, but community members rarely read it cover-to-cover — and the engagement gap between the published plan and the people who live in the schools every day is where most master plans quietly lose legitimacy. A live webapp solves three structural problems PDFs cannot: community access (a parent will spend ten minutes filtering an interactive app, never download a 170-page PDF), board operational use (the fastest way to see what Priority 1 projects haven't been funded is filtering by priority in real time during a meeting), and bond campaign readiness (when the District goes to voters, the webapp becomes the spine of community engagement, with every dollar mapped to a real project at a real school).
How often should a California school district update its facility master plan?
Every 3–5 years for the full plan, with annual refresh on the financial model and priority list. The Office of Public School Construction expects current master planning evidence for many funding applications, and demographics shift fast enough that a 7-year-old plan is often dangerously stale. Under Proposition 2 (Nov 2024) and AB 247, every district participating in the School Facility Program must file a board-approved five-year School Facilities Master Plan.
What's the role of the school board in facility master planning?
The board sets the success criteria upfront (LCAP priorities, equity goals, fiscal posture), reviews scenarios as they emerge, and ultimately adopts the prioritized project list as policy. Boards that aren't engaged early end up rejecting recommendations late, which kills momentum. Most successful master plans run a board workshop at the start, mid-project, and adoption.
How long does a master plan take to develop?
4–6 months for a typical mid-sized district. The pacing constraints are usually demographic data collection (CALPADS pulls, vendor forecasts) and community engagement cycles, not the analysis itself. The Yosemite USD engagement closed in six months across three main schools, two satellite facilities, $74.8M in identified capital needs, and a fully built interactive webapp.
Can we use Prop 2 funding for master planning?
Some master planning activities qualify for OPSC funding under specific programs, but most planning costs are funded from the district's general fund or carved out of a bond program's soft-cost budget. We help districts structure planning costs to maximize reimbursement where possible.
From our team
Watch
40 Years Transforming Schools: Joe Dixon on Building Communities Through Better Facilities
Meet Joe Dixon, founder of School Leaders and a 40-year veteran of transforming educational environments. From starting at the bottom of Capistrano Unified in 1984 to leading Prop 51's passage for California school funding, Joe's journey proves that great schools create great communities — sometimes one lunch table at a time.
Ready to talk about facility master planning?
30 minutes with one of our advisors. We'll listen first, share where we've seen this play out, and tell you honestly whether we can help.