School LeadersContact

For Business Officials

Consulting for Chief Business Officials

The CBO chair is where vague district ambitions become real numbers, defensible projections, and an AB 1200 status the county will sign off on. When the math doesn't work, the political problems start. We help CBOs make the math work.

Where we come in

What we hear from business officials

  • LCFF projection volatility from COLA assumptions and DOF release cycles
  • AB 1200 fiscal certification (positive / qualified / negative) under pressure
  • Multi-year planning when structural deficits are emerging
  • Bond financing decisions and EMMA continuing disclosure
  • SACS reporting and unaudited actuals lifecycle
  • Reserves policy under board scrutiny

Frequently asked

Questions business officials ask us

How do we maintain a positive AB 1200 certification?

Four habits: (1) build the multi-year projection conservatively — don't assume the high-end DOF COLA, (2) get reserves above 6% (more if county practice is stricter), (3) keep contributions to retiree benefits visible and on-schedule, (4) document one-time vs ongoing carefully in SACS. The certification flips when the COE reviewer can't see how you'll meet obligations in years 2 and 3 — so the projection is everything.

What's the right reserves target for our district?

State minimum is 3% for districts under 1,000 ADA, scaling down for larger districts. FCMAT's practical floor is closer to 6–10% for most districts; 15%+ for districts with significant volatility (charter conversions, declining enrollment, large bond debt service). The right number is what lets you absorb a 1-year COLA reduction without immediate cuts.

How do you build a defensible multi-year projection?

Three principles: (1) tie every assumption to a named source (DOF release, CDE rate publication, board-approved labor contract), (2) build at least one downside scenario alongside the base case, and (3) make the methodology auditable — anyone should be able to recompute any year's projection from the inputs. Our Multi-Year Projection tool enforces all three.

What's the difference between Second Interim and Unaudited Actuals?

Second Interim (filed in March) is a projection based on year-to-date actuals through January 31, with revised assumptions through fiscal year-end and the next two years. Unaudited Actuals (filed in September) is the actual closing balance for the year that just ended, before the external audit. Both feed AB 1200, but Second Interim is the more politically loaded — it's where the COE forms its opinion.

Talk to someone who's been in your seat.

Our advisors are former California business officials. 30 minutes to learn whether we can help.