Before you can prioritize, you need an honest picture of what's failing, what's degrading, and what's working. School Leaders builds Facility Needs Assessments and §17070.75 Deferred Maintenance Plans that hold up under board scrutiny, inform the next 5-year capital plan — and ship with a live, multi-view operations dashboard the district uses every week, not just at adoption.
Walk every campus. Document every system. Assign condition (Poor / Fair / Good) and priority (High / Medium / Low) per asset across HVAC, Fire/Life Safety, Roofing, Asphalt/Hardscape, Lighting, Interior Paint, Exterior Wall/Facade, Landscape/Grounds, and Flooring. Tie every deficiency to a planning-level cost estimate. Map every project to its appropriate funding stream — RRMA, Bond, State (OPSC / Prop 2), Grants, Local Capital. Then build the dashboard. Every Deferred Maintenance Plan and Facility Needs Assessment we deliver now ships with a live, hosted, three-view operations dashboard (Executive Summary, Site Dashboards for every campus, and Facilities Operations / Bid Package view) — proven at Elk Grove USD with $406M of backlog across 18,532 asset records and 72 sites.
What you get
Deliverables
Site-by-site facility condition report aligned to California School Facility Program standards
Asset inventory database — every asset tagged with site, category, condition, priority, replacement year, planning-level cost
§17070.75-compliant Deferred Maintenance Plan (DMP) with board-resolution adoption package
Five-year forecast with replacement-cliff analysis
RRMA-aligned funding strategy mapping every project to its appropriate funding stream
Live, multi-view facilities operations dashboard — Executive Summary, per-site dashboards, and bid-package view, hosted and updated by School Leaders
Williams Act / FIT-remediation integration
Board-ready summary deck with school-by-school breakdowns
Outcomes
Defensible facility data that drives bond project lists, anchors RRMA programming, supports OPSC and Prop 2 modernization pursuits, and stays current through a live dashboard the district actually uses.
New free tool
Exploring modular replacement or expansion? Try the Modular Campus Designer.
A kit-of-parts builder for California modular school construction. Compose a campus from 11 module types, see live SF / capacity / cost / savings rollups, and stream an AI analysis covering DSA Pre-Checked Plans pathway and modular-vs-site-built cost comparison (typically 25–40% savings).
Every Deferred Maintenance Plan ships with a live operations dashboard
At Elk Grove USD scale — 68 schools, 18,532 asset records, $406M of backlog across 11 asset categories — a PDF is necessary but cannot be the operating system. So every §17070.75 Deferred Maintenance Plan and Facility Needs Assessment we deliver ships with a live, multi-view facilities operations dashboard: Executive Summary, per-site dashboards for every campus, and a Facilities Operations / Bid Package view for M&O sequencing. Hosted, secured, and updated by School Leaders. Try filtering the demo below by site type, condition, and priority — the rollups, the site detail, and the five-year replacement cliff all update live.
egusd.facilitiesplan.org/dashboard Live · Auth required
Built by School Leaders
Elk Grove Unified School District
Deferred Maintenance Plan — Facilities Operations Dashboard
The live, board-adopted, RRMA-aligned dashboard for 68 schools, $406M of backlog, and 1,854 prioritized projects across FY 2025–2030.
18,532 asset records
Total DM backlog
$406.4M
11 asset categories
High-priority $
$307.5M
75.7% of backlog
Sites affected
69 / 72
Districtwide
Project pipeline
1,854
FY 2025–2030 plan
Type
Sites in view
30
of 30 shown · 72 total
Backlog (filtered)
$227.8M
$227,771,680
High-priority share
$172.4M
≈ 75.7% of backlog
Immediate (poor) items
3,271
7,597 assets in view
Sites by backlog · 30 shown
Site dashboard · Franklin High School
Total backlog
$29.9M
Immediate
287
poor-condition items
High-priority $
$24.8M
Asset count
612
Top 5 asset categories at this site
condition: poor
HVAC
$9.6M
Fire/Life Safety/PA
$10.9M
Roofing
$6.8M
Asphalt/Hardscape
$1.1M
Lighting
$717K
Top immediate items (sample)
Asset
Cond.
Priority
Est. cost
Fire/Life Safety/PA
Replace rooftop package units · District Personnel
Poor
High
$8.1M
Fire/Life Safety/PA
Replace fire alarm to new current system
Poor
High
$5.7M
Roofing
Replace · 2027 target
Poor
High
$4.8M
Lighting
Replace site exterior lighting to LED
Fair
Medium
$1.2M
Live dashboard shows the full asset register · 612 records at this site.
Board-adopted Ed Code §17070.75 / RRMA-aligned Living plan · annual refreshDemo of the live EGUSD facilities operations dashboard School Leaders built and hosts.
EGUSD is one of California's largest districts (63,421 students · 320 sq mi). The dashboard model is portable to any district above ~3,000 asset records.
Frequently asked
Questions districts ask us
Do you build a live dashboard with every Facility Needs Assessment and Deferred Maintenance Plan?
Yes — every engagement now ships with a live, multi-view facilities operations dashboard alongside the published document. Three principal views: Executive Summary (districtwide totals, asset-category breakdown, top sites, five-year replacement forecast), Site Dashboards (one for every campus, with backlog, immediate items, top asset risks, and full asset register), and Facilities Operations / Bid Package view (priority mix, package size by cost, age-vs-condition analysis for M&O sequencing). Hosted, secured, and updated by School Leaders. Proven at Elk Grove USD with 18,532 asset records across 72 sites.
What is a Deferred Maintenance Plan and why does our district need one?
A Deferred Maintenance Plan (DMP) is the multi-year forecast a California school district maintains under Education Code §17070.75 — the statute establishing the Routine Restricted Maintenance Account (RRMA) requirement for districts participating in the School Facility Program. A defensible DMP is board-adopted, asset-data-driven, multi-year (typically five-year), aligned to RRMA programming, and updated annually as conditions change. Districts without a current DMP run reactive maintenance, miss capital-funding windows, and accumulate compounding backlog. Our DMP engagement closes those gaps and produces both the statutorily-required document and the live dashboard the M&O team works from.
What's the difference between a facility needs assessment and a FIT report?
A FIT report (Facility Inspection Tool) is a state-mandated annual compliance scan for Williams Act purposes — it certifies basic adequacy at each site. A facility needs assessment is the strategic, deeper-dive condition analysis across every asset, that informs capital planning. FIT tells you whether you're in compliance; a needs assessment tells you what to spend RRMA, bond, and state-grant money on. We integrate FIT findings into the needs assessment so districts run both systems together.
How is the DMP different from a Five-Year Facilities Master Plan under Prop 2?
They're complementary. The Five-Year Facilities Master Plan (required under AB 247 / Prop 2 for districts participating in the renewed School Facility Program) is the broader strategic plan covering modernization, new construction, capacity additions, and long-range capital priorities. The DMP is the focused operating document for ongoing and major maintenance under §17070.75. The DMP's asset-condition data feeds into the Master Plan; the Master Plan's modernization scope coordinates with the DMP's replacement sequencing. Districts pursuing Prop 2 / SFP funding need both documents current.
How do we use the assessment results?
Five places: (1) the §17070.75 DMP as the asset-level forecast; (2) the Five-Year Facilities Master Plan as the input for modernization and new-construction priorities; (3) bond ballot project lists (legally required to be specific); (4) OPSC and Prop 2 SFP applications for state modernization grants; (5) the LCAP for state-funding alignment. The live dashboard is the operational instrument tying all five together.
How long does a Facility Needs Assessment + DMP engagement take?
Three to six months for a typical mid-sized California district (10,000–30,000 students, 15–30 sites). Six to nine months for a larger district like Elk Grove USD (60,000+ students, 70+ sites, 18,000+ asset records). The pacing constraints are typically consolidating existing asset data and the site-by-site condition assessment.
Who should be on the assessment team?
The walk teams need a credentialed school facilities professional, an estimator who knows current California construction costs, and someone with district MEP / structural background. We bring all three, plus the data engineering required to build the live dashboard.
From our team
Watch
40 Years Transforming Schools: Joe Dixon on Building Communities Through Better Facilities
Meet Joe Dixon, founder of School Leaders and a 40-year veteran of transforming educational environments. From starting at the bottom of Capistrano Unified in 1984 to leading Prop 51's passage for California school funding, Joe's journey proves that great schools create great communities — sometimes one lunch table at a time.
Ready to talk about facility needs assessments?
30 minutes with one of our advisors. We'll listen first, share where we've seen this play out, and tell you honestly whether we can help.